Named ownership, not shared folders
We show how to bind every open item to a control owner and a due date inside your remediation workflow—before status meetings turn into archaeology.
Seoul-rooted instruction for remediation discipline
ML Platform teaches audit and control teams how to operate a financial auditing app for audit issue remediation tracking—so findings leave the register with owners, evidence, and dates that hold up.
Issue registers · control owners · close evidence
Why teams enroll
We show how to bind every open item to a control owner and a due date inside your remediation workflow—before status meetings turn into archaeology.
Learners build close packages reviewers can reopen months later: what changed, who signed, and which test sample confirms the fix.
Reporting rhythms are framed for Seoul-based assurance and internal audit teams who brief management in both Korean and English contexts.
Programs
Start with the flagship, or explore focused modules for issue registers and tracker design.
Operate remediation workflows from intake to board summary with live exercises on aging, escalation, and evidence.
Design fields, statuses, and handoffs so your remediation log stays usable after the external audit leaves.
See how ML Platform maps app workflows to the training outcomes your control owners need.
Voices from cohorts
“The aging view in Module 3 forced us to stop hiding ‘in progress’ items that had no owner. We closed 14 findings before the next ICFR walkthrough.”Hyejin P. · Internal Audit Lead, Seoul
“Useful for linking control owners to due dates. The sample evidence pack is a bit rigid for ITGCs, so we adapted the template—but the structure stuck.”Marcus · Client in financial services
Rated the flagship after completing the board-ready status exercise. Clear, paced, and specific to remediation—not a generic audit overview.Platform review · Jun 2025
Talk with us about cohort dates or a private workshop for your Jungrang-gu or wider Seoul team.