Reviews
Comments reference modules and features from our remediation programs—not generic praise.
“Audit Issue Remediation Mastery’s escalation tabletop exposed that our ITGC findings had three ‘owners’ and zero due dates. We fixed the schema before year-end testing.”Sora Kim · SOX Program Manager
Short note from Busan: the aging dashboard exercise alone was worth the travel. Still wish Module 5 had more SAP examples.Jun · Busan
Completed Oversight Suite seating. Board-ready status workshop replaced our vague heat map with a one-page owner/date/evidence view.Verified learner · Jan 2026
“We used the evidence pack checklist from Issue Register Studio on 22 open items. Nine were not actually remediable yet—which was uncomfortable, but accurate.”Client in manufacturing
Instructor pushed back when we tried to mark items closed without reperformance notes. That friction was the point of the course.Elena V. · External audit liaison
Case studies
A Seoul-headquartered retailer entered Audit Issue Remediation Mastery with 61 open ICFR items and an aging average of 97 days. After remapping statuses and enforcing owner fields, the team reported 19 overdue items by the next audit committee packet. They noted the program does not automate testing—analysts still pull samples manually—but the tracker discipline stopped silent slips.
A Korea-based banking subsidiary struggled with English board packs that lagged the Korean working register. Using the Remediation Tracker brief and Field Desk seating, they defined a single source of status fields with bilingual labels. Time-to-prepare the monthly pack fell from roughly two weeks of reconciliation to four focused days. Limitation acknowledged: legal translations still require compliance review outside the course.